Abstract

The commercial launch of dicamba-tolerant (DT) crops has resulted in increased dicamba usage and a high number of dicamba off-target movement complaints on sensitive soybeans (Glycine max L.). Dicamba is a synthetic auxin and low dosages as 0.028 g ae ha−1 can induce injury on sensitive soybean. Tank contamination has been identified as one of the sources for unintended sensitive crop exposure. The labels of new dicamba formulations require a triple rinse cleanout procedure following applications. Cleanout efficacy might vary based on the sprayer type and procedure followed. This study was performed to quantify dicamba retention in commercial sprayers and assess the risk for crop injury from remaining contaminants. The results indicate triple rinse with water was comparable to cleanout procedures utilizing ammonium, commercial tank cleaners, and glyphosate in rinses. Dicamba contaminants in final rinsates resulted in <15% visual injury and no yield response when applied to sensitive soybeans at R1 stage. A survey of 25 agricultural sprayers demonstrated a cleanout efficacy of 99.996% by triple rinsing with water following applications of dicamba at 560 g ae ha−1, with concentrations of less than 1 ug mL−1 detected rinsates from the fourth rinse. A dose response experiment predicted dosages causing 5% visual injury and the yield losses were 0.1185 and 2.8525 g ae ha−1. However, symptomology was observed for all tested dosages, including the rate as low as 0.03 g ae ha−1. The results from this study suggest triple rinsing with sufficient amount of water (≥10% of tank volume) is adequate for the removal of dicamba residues from sprayers to avoid sensitive soybean damage. This study can provide producers with confidence in cleanout procedures following dicamba applications, and aid in minimizing risk for off-target movement through tank contamination.

Highlights

  • Recent commercialization of dicamba tolerant (DT) cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and soybean (Glycine max (L)

  • No sprayer by cleanout procedure interactions were observed for dicamba residue retention at any rinse

  • Symptomology on sensitive soybean, but they were not higher than the lowest dosage expected to have not been found on any sprayer tested if triple rinse cleanout procedures were followed

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent commercialization of dicamba tolerant (DT) cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and soybean (Glycine max (L). Agronomy 2020, 10, 772 in dicamba usage in DT crops has led to unprecedented numbers of off-target movement complaints with an estimated 1.46 million hectares of sensitive soybean being damaged in the first year following commercialization of the technology [1]. Primary sources of dicamba off-target movement have been identified as spray particle drift, volatility, and sprayer contamination [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. Adverse weather conditions can strongly influence the amount of herbicide movement away from the target site via particle drift and volatility [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Effective cleanout procedures need to be identified to minimize dicamba retention and reduce the risk for crop injury

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call