Abstract

The article analyzes scientific views, the concept of "diaspora", classification of diasporas, modern and classical diasporas, a description of existing scientific views as an object of a transnational community. The conclusion is made about the absence of a single generally accepted definition of the concept of “diaspora”, which is necessary both theoretically and practically. n the conclusion, the author's views on improving research on the history of diasporas are presented.

Highlights

  • A characteristic feature of a globalizing world is the strengthening of migration processes

  • Despite the fact thatits ethnic mosaicism increased significantly, it remained naturalterritorial dispersal of peoples and did not contribute to the formation of diasporas, inMore than 130 representatives of various nationalities live in the republic.Unlike other states, where diaspora themes have become the subject of closeattention of scientists because of the problems of refugees and their migration, interethnic conflicts,In Uzbekistan, interest in the life of diasporas began in connection with the increased interest of peoples inknowledge of their ethnic roots

  • The Jewish diaspora becomes, with this approach, if not the only criterion, at least the starting point, according to which it is customary to check all other scattering nations for their compliance with the term “diaspora” [15, p. 9-10].“At first glance it seems quite clear that the term “diaspora”can only be applied to universally recognized peoples of dispersion, for example, such as Jews, Armenians or Gypsies

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

A characteristic feature of a globalizing world is the strengthening of migration processes. The growth of the number of immigrant communities and their institutionalization is so rapid that, according to some experts, this gives reason to talk about “diasporaization of the world”, and some of them believe that the modern world is “not so much the sum of states ... Despite the fact thatits ethnic mosaicism increased significantly, it remained naturalterritorial dispersal of peoples and did not contribute to the formation of diasporas, inMore than 130 representatives of various nationalities live in the republic.Unlike other states, where diaspora themes have become the subject of closeattention of scientists because of the problems of refugees and their migration, interethnic conflicts,In Uzbekistan, interest in the life of diasporas began in connection with the increased interest of peoples inknowledge of their ethnic roots. Almost every researcher interprets it in his own way and gives him his own definition. - Serious discussions about its semantic load for decades have been conducted even within the framework of the same scientific disciplines

DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.