Abstract

Simple SummaryThe diamondback moth is a serious pest of crucifer crops. To control this pest, the use of intercropping (such as trap crops) is gaining attention since they are ecologically safe. However, such approaches require an understanding host plants which are most attractive to the pest. In this study, we quantified different volatiles released by Barbarea vulgaris in response to the diamondback moth larval feeding. We investigated olfactory responses of the adult diamondback moth to natural and simulated volatiles released by infested plants. We also investigated how volatile effects changed in response to larval feeding treatments. Overall, our findings indicated the relationship between key volatile compound, host plant cues emission and regulation of the diamondback moth adult female behavior due to key volatile triggered by the diamondback moth larvae feeding on B. vulgaris.The diamondback moth (DBM) is a destructive pest of crucifer crops. In this study, DBM larvae shown to herbivore induced plant volatiles (HIPVs) that were attractive to adult females exposed in a Y-tube olfactometer. Our results showed that olfactory responses of adult females to HIPVs induced by third instar larvae feeding on Barbarea vulgaris were significantly higher (20.40 ± 1.78; mean moths (%) ± SD) than those induced by first instar larvae (14.80 ± 1.86; mean moths (%) ± SD). Meanwhile, a significant concentration of Sulphur-containing isothiocyanate, 3-methylsulfinylpropyl isothiocyanate, and 4-methylsulfinyl-3-butenyl isothiocyanate were detected in HIPVs released by third instar larvae compared to those released by first instar larvae while feeding on B. vulgaris. When the DBM females were exposed to synthetic chemicals, singly and in blend form, a similar response was observed as to natural HIPVs. Our study demonstrated that the relationship between isothiocyanates acting as plant defense compounds, host plant cues emission and regulation of the DBM adult female behavior due to key volatile triggered by the DBM larvae feeding on B. vulgaris.

Highlights

  • Plants are continuously at risks of attack by herbivore insect

  • In the FLB and TLB treatments, means of 3-methylsulfinylpropyl isothiocyanate were significantly lower, while the MB treatments were not significantly different from the HB. (Table 1). These findings demonstrated that the FLB suppressed the emission of this sulphur containing isothiocyanates (SIT)

  • Our results showed that host attraction cues (HIPVs) released from B. vulgaris damaged by larvae or mechanical means were involved in host attraction

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Plants are continuously at risks of attack by herbivore insect. As a result, they have evolved many inducible defense mechanisms to avoid damage [1]. Herbivory may modify the reallocation of primary plant metabolites or trigger other resistance-related plant responses in undamaged neighbors which act directly or indirectly against herbivores [2,3]. Efforts to find alternative control approaches include cultural methods, such as the use of trap crops and intercropping [11]. Such approaches require an understanding of competing host plants which are most attractive to the pest

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call