Abstract

Shelah proved recently that if κ > ω and S ⊂ κ + is a stationary set of ordinals of cofinality different from cf(κ), then 2 κ = κ + implies ◇ κ+ (S). We show that for singular κ, an elaboration on his argument allows us to derive ◇ κ+ (T) from 2 κ = κ + + □ * κ where T = {δ < κ + | cf(δ) = cf(κ)}. This gives a strong restriction on the existence of saturated ideals on κ + .

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.