Abstract
The dialectic of Islamic legal norms and cultural customs often cause problems. Therefore, a relevant ijtihad (independent reasoning) is considerably required. By using a library research approach, the Nurcholish Madjid’s inclusive paradigm, and triangulation as a technique to collect the data, this study shows that the dialectic of Islamic legal norms and cultural customs has given rise to three typologies of inclusive Islamic legal thought; Firstly, Nadirsyah Hosen who has Islamic legal thoughts rejects absolutism-exclusiveism; Secondly, KH A Wahid Hasyim and KH Ahmad Ishomuddin who have a paradigm of Islamic (legal) thought see positively to religious plurality, Thirdly, the thoughts of KH Abdurrahman Wahid and KH Said Aqil Siradj who have Islamic legal thought stand for universal humanitarian values.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
