Abstract
In this paper, we study the size and power of various diagnostic statistics for univariate conditional heteroscedasticity models. These test statistics include the residual-based tests recently derived by Tse, Li and Mak, and Wooldridge, respectively. Monte-Carlo experiments with 1000 replications are conducted to generate conditional variances which follow the autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity (ARCH)/GARCH processes. We use quasi-maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) method to obtain estimates of parameters under different ARCH/ generalized ARCH (GARCH) models. It is found that the Tse and Li–Mak diagnostics are more powerful.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
