Diagnostic yield and safety of EUS-FNA biopsy in sub-aortic and para-aortic lymph node stations with the trans-aortic approach: a case series and literature review

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground: Sub-aortic (station 5) and para-aortic (station 6) lymph nodes are not easily accessible due to the interposition of the aorta and the left pulmonary artery. Taking a biopsy from those stations could be of value when there are no other mediastinal lymph node stations or when biopsy in other sites failed to reach a diagnosis. Surgery is the gold standard technique in the evaluation of those stations; endoscopic ultrasound-fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been proposed as a minimally invasive technique through the trans-aortic approach, with an acceptable diagnostic yield and safety profile.Objective: To evaluate diagnostic accuracy and safety of the trans-aortic EUS-FNA in lymph node stations 5 and 6.Methods: We reviewed all patients who underwent trans-aortic EUS-FNA from 2010 to 2017, for mediastinal lymph node enlargement or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) positivity (integrated 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-d-glucose). Demographic characteristics, lesion site and size, needle, final diagnosis, and complications were collected.Results: A total of 11 patients were included, 5 males, mean age 59 years. Samples were inadequate in two cases, a diagnosis of lung cancer was reached in four patients (two adenocarcinoma and two squamous cell carcinoma) and five cases were negative for malignancy (one confirmed by surgery, two were found to be cancer at percutaneous lung biopsy and transbronchial biopsy, one patient received a diagnosis of Langerhans cell histiocytosis by transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, and one patient was lost at follow-up). The sensitivity for malignancy was 57%, and the overall diagnostic accuracy was 45%. No complications occurred.Conclusions: Trans-aortic EUS-FNA could be proposed as a valuable and safe approach for taking biopsy from mediastinal lymph node stations 5 and 6.