Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic value of screening laboratory tests in women who had recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL).Methods: A total of 252 women with RPL managed in our tertiary referral research and education hospital were included in the study. Risk factors recorded involved age, gravidity, parity, number of prior live births, number of pregnancy losses, and thrombophlia tests. The cases were divided into three different groups and each group was analyzed separately.Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the first and second groups in terms of clinical and laboratory parameters (p > 0.05). In the third group, there was a statistically significant difference among cases in terms of parity, gravidity, number of pregnancy losses, serum AT III levels, APCR, and age of the women. According to the logistic regression model, odds ratios (95% CI) were 6.116 (3.797–9.852), 5.665 (2.657–12.079), 4.763 (3.099–7.321), 4.729 (3.080–7.260), 2.820 (1.836–4.333), and 1.911 (1.232–2.965), respectively.Conclusions: We do not recommend the screening of all women with RPL, but in women with high parity and those who had prior live birth pregnancies, increased AT III, and APCR may be diagnostic markers for subsequent pregnancy loss.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
