Diagnostic value of parameters of myocardial work in patients after myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Objective to reveal the differences in the global parameters of myocardial work of the left ventricle (LV) in patients with preserved LV ejection fraction (EF) after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and healthy individuals. Methods the study included 45 people with primary STEMI (group 1): 13 women and 32 men aged 38 to 66 years (52.3 ± 7.4). The control group (group 2) consisted of 70 healthy individuals aged 39.3 ± 8.9 years, including 34 men and 36 women. Myocardial infarction was confirmed by ECG data, a diagnostically significant level of cardiospecific markers (troponin T, CPK-MB) and by the results of coronary angiography with the presence of one infarct-related coronary artery in the absence of hemodynamically significant stenosis of other arteries. Echocardiography was performed on the 7th-9th day and 6 months after STEMI using a Vivid GE 95 Healthcare ultrasound scanner (USA). Echocardiographic image analysis was performed using EchoPAC software version 202 (GE Healthcare). The standard echo parameters were determined: end-diastolic volume (EDV, ml), end-systolic volume (ESV, ml), LV myocardial mass index (LVMI, g / m2), EF by the Simpson biplane method,%. The preserved EF was considered the value of EF greater than or equal to 50%. The following indicators of myocardial work were assessed: global myocardial work index (GWI, mm Hg%), global constructive work (GCW, mm Hg%), global wasted work (GWW, mm Hg%), global work efficiency (GWE,%). Statistical data processing was performed using the Statistica 13.0 software package (StatSoft Inc., USA). Results 6 months after STEMI, 26 subjects had an EF ≥50% (58.8 ± 5.8%). The mean LVEF in group 2 was 60.8 ± 4.6% (p = 0.12). EDV in group 1 was 122.5 [95% CI 104.4; 140.7] ml, in group 2 - 104.7 [95% CI 99.1; 110.3] ml (p = 0.003). ESV in group 1 - 83.8 [95% CI 28.5; 139.0] ml, in group 2 - 40.7 [95% CI 37.6; 43.7] ml (p = 0.02); in group 1, LVMI was 89.3 [95% CI 77.4; 101.1] g / m2, in group 2 - 67.4 [95% CI 63.7; 71.1] g / m2 (p = 0.03). GWI was 1890.1 [95% CI 1730.0; 2050.2] mm Hg% in group 1, in group 2 - 2039.8 [95% CI 1956.3; 2123.3] mmHg% (p = 0.002), GCW - 2132.4 [95% CI 1958.5; 2306.3] mmHg% and 2335.5 [95% CI 2251.7; 2419.4] mm Hg% (p = 0.003), respectively. GWE 95.4 [95% CI 94.1; 96.6] and 97.1 [95% CI 96.8; 97.4]% (p = 0.02), GWW 76.6 [95% CI 55.9; 97.3] and 50.0 [95% CI 44.0; 56.0] m Hg% (p = 0.06) in the corresponding groups. Conclusion Thus, despite the satisfactory values of LVEF, the indicators of myocardial work, except for global wasted work, had lower values in patients with STEMI compared with healthy individuals.