Diagnostic value of circulating miRNA in the benign and malignant lung nodules: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide, and its diagnosis remains a significant challenge. Identifying effective methods to differentiate benign from malignant lung nodules is of paramount importance. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) for the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant lung nodules. This study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted across 4 electronic databases, without any temporal restrictions. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were strictly applied to assess the clinical applications of circulating miRNAs. A robust and transparent quality assessment was performed using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 tool, and rigorous statistical analyses were conducted to synthesize the various diagnostic measures. In the meta-analysis of 11 studies, quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 assessment revealed < 5% high-risk methodologies, ensuring robustness. Sensitivity and Specificity were consolidated at 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72-0.90) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73-0.88), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 4.45 (95% CI: 3.03-6.54) and 0.21 (95% CI: 0.12-0.35), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 21.31 (95% CI: 10.25-44.30) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86-0.91). Subgroup analysis highlighted significant variations in diagnostic accuracy by ethnicity and miRNA source, with non-Asian populations and serum-based tests showing higher diagnostic accuracy. This meta-analysis demonstrated that circulating miRNAs hold substantial diagnostic value in distinguishing between benign and malignant lung nodules.