Abstract
This study assesses the diagnostic accuracy of transferrinuria and an albumin-specific dipstick assay for detection of renal target organ damage (microalbuminuria) in hypertensive patients in a general practice setting. A spot urine sample of 130 nondiabetic patients with elevated office blood pressure readings (>140 and/or 90 mmHg) was investigated by measuring albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) and transferrin to creatinine ratio (TCR) and by using an albumin-specific dipstick test (Micral). ACR was considered as comparative gold standard. TCR was elevated (>0.19 mg/mmol) in 26 urine samples (20.0% of the test samples). ACR was raised in 29 samples (22.3% of the test samples). Elevated TCR had a sensitivity of 97% and specificity of 91% for detection of microalbuminuria. Positive predicting value for microalbuminuria was 65%; negative predicting value was 99%. Correlation between ACR and TCR was strong (r=0.96). Dipstick testing for albumin was positive in 23 urine samples (17.7% of the test samples), 27 (20.8%) tests were false positive and six (4.6%) false negative. When dipstick was positive, the sensitivity of detecting microalbuminuria was 79%, and specificity 73%. In conclusion, detection of urinary transferrin in nondiabetic patients with hypertension is strongly associated with urinary albumin excretion. However, assessment of TCR does not identify additional patients with microalbuminuria compared to measurement of ACR alone. The semiquantitative Micral test offers a simple and valuable method to screen hypertensive patients for microalbuminuria in a primary care setting.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.