Abstract

The diagnostic criteria of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) are based on clinical findings and auxiliary investigations, of which the most important ones are neurophysiological findings. Since the European Federation of Neurological Societies/ Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) incorporated distal CMAP duration into the neurophysiological diagnostic criteria, their sensitivity increased to 81.3% and specificity to 96.2%. We describe a case of a 58-year-old man who was referred to our electromyography (EMG) laboratory for a second opinion regarding his diagnosis. The patient exhibited sensory-motor polyneuropathy with prominent hypotrophy of the calf muscles. Electrodiagnostic testing prior to admission had revealed a probable axonal neuropathy. In our EMG laboratory, we accomplished nerve conduction studies (NCS) of both hands and legs and we noted a prominent increase of distal CMAP duration, whereas distal motor latencies (DML) were within normal limits. As the CMAP amplitude in the tibial and peroneal nerves was less than 1 millivolt (mV), the existence of myelinopathy could not be inferred from any other parameters identified in the lower extremities. Neurophysiological investigation of both hands was necessary, even though the clinical picture of polyneuropathy was substantially more prominent in the legs. It is important to distinguish between axonal and myelin sheath lesions in order to understand the pathogenetic aspects of neuropathy. In addition, treatment of demyelinating autoimmune neuropathies can be offered and it is effective. In our patient, distal CMAP duration was the main discriminating parameter among the various neurophysiological parameters of the CIDP diagnostic criteria.

Highlights

  • The diagnostic criteria of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) are based on clinical findings and auxiliary investigations

  • Prolonged distal CMAP duration is of high importance; a value equal to or greater than 9 milliseconds in only one of four nerves distinguishes CIDP from other neuropathies with a sensitivity of 0.78 and specificity of 0.94 [2]

  • We describe a patient with a one-year history of paraesthesia and weakness in all 4 limbs, whose prolonged distal CMAP duration was the decisive parameter for the diagnosis of CIDP

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The diagnostic criteria of CIDP are based on clinical findings and auxiliary investigations. We describe a patient with a one-year history of paraesthesia and weakness in all 4 limbs, whose prolonged distal CMAP duration was the decisive parameter for the diagnosis of CIDP. We describe a case of a 58-year-old man with hypertension who had undergone aortic valve replacement, necessitating long-term anticoagulant therapy; he had been engaging in sports He has absolved ground school; he is a postman and driver of postal car. We have found hypaesthesia distally of patella with loss of vibration sense on feet He was able to squat down only with the help of arms and standing on one leg disclosed pelvis instability. In our EMG laboratory, we performed nerve conduction studies (NCS) of both hands and legs, which showed a prominent increase of distal CMAP duration, whereas distal motor latencies (DML) were within normal limits. The patient is on maintenance immunosuppression with prednisone 10 mg every other day and azathioprine 100 mg once daily

Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call