Abstract

The diagnostic sensitivities of serum bile acids determined by three different methods in the fasting and in the postprandial state were compared in 43 patients with cirrhosis of the liver. When a method with high analytical sensitivity (capillary gas-liquid chromatography, GLC, or radioimmunoassay, RIA) was used, the serum concentrations of bile acids exhibited similar diagnostic sensitivities in the fasting state (GLC, 98%; RIA, 93%) and in the postprandial state (GLC, 95%; RIA, 93%). By contrast, when an enzymatic method with limited analytical sensitivity was employed, the diagnostic sensitivity of fasting serum bile acids was lower (79%) than that of postprandial serum bile acids (93%). The measurement of individual serum bile acids by GLC did not add any further diagnostic information. The results of this study demonstrate that the diagnostic sensitivity of serum bile acids strongly depends on the analytical method used.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call