Abstract
Abstract Background Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is an image-based virtual fractional flow reserve (FFR) computed by three dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA) and estimated flow velocity. Several studies have reported that QFR had a good diagnostic performance as compared with wire-based FFR or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). Purpose We compared the diagnostic reliability of QFR for detection of myocardial ischemia with other angiographic and visual predicted indices. Methods In 301 coronary lesions (263 patients) from our QFR database for previously-reported two studies, the diagnostic reliability of QFR, several angiographic and visual predicted indices were investigated using ROC analysis as reference of FFR≤0.8 or iFR≤0.89. Visual predicted FFR were estimated by 3 physicians (25-year experienced expert, 10-year experienced senior physician and 3-year experienced trainee) blinded to other indices. Results Area under the curve (AUC) of each index in ROC analysis is shown in Table. Conclusion QFR was reliable index detecting myocardial ischemia compared with other angiographic and experience-dependent visual predicted indices. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
