Abstract

In this study, three problems associated with diagnosing diffuse axonal injury (DAI) in patients with traumatic brain injury are reviewed: the shortage of scientific evidence supporting the 6-hour loss of consciousness (LOC) diagnostic criterion to discriminate concussion and DAI, the low sensitivity of conventional brain MRI in the detection of DAI lesions, and the inappropriateness of the term diffuse in DAI. Pathological study by brain biopsy is required to confirm DAI; however, performing a brain biopsy for the diagnosis of DAI in a living patient is impossible. Therefore, the diagnosis of DAI in a living patient is clinically determined based on the duration of LOC, clinical manifestations, and the results of conventional brain MRI. There is a shortage of scientific evidence supporting the use of the 6-hour LOC criterion to distinguish DAI from concussion, and axonal injuries have been detected in many concussion cases with a less than 6-hour LOC. Moreover, due to the low sensitivity of conventional brain MRI, which can only detect DAI lesions in approximately half of DAI patients, diagnostic MRI criteria for DAI are not well established. In contrast, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been shown to have high sensitivity for the detection of DAI lesions. As DTI is a relatively new method, further studies aimed at the establishment of diagnostic criteria for DAI detection using DTI are needed. On the other hand, because DAI distribution is not diffuse but multifocal, and because axonal injury lesions have been detected in concussion patients, steps to standardize the use of terms related to axonal injury in both concussion and DAI are necessary.

Highlights

  • In 1982, Adams et al introduced the term diffuse axonal injury (DAI) and later defined it as the presence in the white matter of the brain of microscopic axonal damage produced by mechanical forces [1,2]

  • Axonal injuries have been detected in many concussion cases with less than 6-hour loss of consciousness (LOC), and there are opposing opinions regarding the applicability of the term diffuse in DAI [7,11,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22]

  • I reviewed three diagnostic problems associated with DAI: (1) the shortage of scientific evidence supporting the 6-hour LOC diagnostic criterion to discriminate concussion and DAI, (2) the low sensitivity of conventional brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the detection of DAI lesions, and (3) the inappropriateness of the term diffuse in DAI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 1982, Adams et al introduced the term diffuse axonal injury (DAI) and later defined it as the presence in the white matter of the brain of microscopic axonal damage produced by mechanical forces [1,2]. Due to a shortage of scientific evidence supporting the use of the 6-hour LOC criterion to distinguish between concussion and DAI, and the low sensitivity of conventional brain MRI in the detection of DAI lesions, the accuracy of a DAI diagnosis is limited [4,11,12]. I reviewed three diagnostic problems associated with DAI: (1) the shortage of scientific evidence supporting the 6-hour LOC diagnostic criterion to discriminate concussion and DAI, (2) the low sensitivity of conventional brain MRI in the detection of DAI lesions, and (3) the inappropriateness of the term diffuse in DAI

Problem 1
Problem 2
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.