Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a deep learning (DL) algorithm predicting hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (CAD) by using a rest dataset of myocardial computed tomography perfusion (CTP) as compared to invasive evaluation. One hundred and twelve consecutive symptomatic patients scheduled for clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography (ICA) underwent CCTA plus static stress CTP and ICA with invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) for stenoses ranging between 30 and 80%. Subsequently, a DL algorithm for the prediction of significant CAD by using the rest dataset (CTP-DLrest) and stress dataset (CTP-DLstress) was developed. The diagnostic accuracy for identification of significant CAD using CCTA, CCTA + CTP stress, CCTA + CTP-DLrest, and CCTA + CTP-DLstress was measured and compared. The time of analysis for CTP stress, CTP-DLrest, and CTP-DLStress was recorded. Patient-specific sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) of CCTA alone and CCTA + CTPStress were 100%, 33%, 100%, 54%, 63%, 67% and 86%, 89%, 89%, 86%, 88%, 87%, respectively. Patient-specific sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, accuracy, and AUC of CCTA + DLrest and CCTA + DLstress were 100%, 72%, 100%, 74%, 84%, 96% and 93%, 83%, 94%, 81%, 88%, 98%, respectively. All CCTA + CTP stress, CCTA + CTP-DLRest, and CCTA + CTP-DLStress significantly improved detection of hemodynamically significant CAD compared to CCTA alone (p < 0.01). Time of CTP-DL was significantly lower as compared to human analysis (39.2 ± 3.2 vs. 379.6 ± 68.0 s, p < 0.001). Evaluation of myocardial ischemia using a DL approach on rest CTP datasets is feasible and accurate. This approach may be a useful gatekeeper prior to CTP stress..

Highlights

  • Coronary artery disease (CAD) represents one of the leading causes of mortality in the USA [1]

  • Anatomical evaluation of coronaries was strictly confined to invasive coronary angiography (ICA); today, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) represents an important tool to rule out CAD [2, 3]

  • Novel techniques have developed such as CT myocardial perfusion under stress conditions (CTPStress) and fractional flow reserve computed tomography derived (FFRCT) demonstrating the possibility to bridge the coronary anatomy with the physiology and evaluate myocardial ischemia [4, 5]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) represents one of the leading causes of mortality in the USA [1]. Anatomical evaluation of coronaries was strictly confined to invasive coronary angiography (ICA); today, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) represents an important tool to rule out CAD [2, 3]. Novel techniques have developed such as CT myocardial perfusion under stress conditions (CTPStress) and fractional flow reserve computed tomography derived (FFRCT) demonstrating the possibility to bridge the coronary anatomy with the physiology and evaluate myocardial ischemia [4, 5]. CTPStress requires a double acquisition (rest and stress) with related iodine contrast agent administration, radiation exposure concerns and the use of a stressor with potential side effects [4, 9]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call