Abstract

The variability of Alzheimer's disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers (Aβ42, t-Tau and p-Tau) undermines their full-fledged introduction into routine diagnostics and clinical trials. The introduction of automatic systems can improve the diagnostic performance promoting standardization and reducing the impact of preanalytical and analytical factors.Here we assessed the diagnostic performance of a fully automated chemiluminescent enzyme assay (LUMIPULSE) and compared it with that obtained by using the classical manual enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Patients were clinically diagnosed as AD (n = 42) and non-AD (n = 38). Clinical diagnosis was confirmed at follow-up. LUMIPULSE Aβ42 was reduced in AD (969.4 ± 329.6 pg/mL vs. 1625.9 ± 745.9 pg/mL, p <0.001), whereas LUMIPULSE t-Tau was increased in AD (768.2 ± 281.0 pg/mL vs. 337.5 ± 159.1 pg/mL, p < 0.001) compared to non-AD patients. Both LUMIPULSE Aβ42 (AUC = 0.78, spec. = 0.74, sens. = 0.76) and t-Tau (AUC = 0.94, spec. = 0.93, sens. = 0.87) showed good accuracy in distinguish AD from non-AD and a high correlation with the manual ELISAs (r = 0.87, p < 0.001 and r = 0.92, p < 0.001, respectively). LUMIPULSE improves clinical accuracy in AD diagnosis, promoting the use of standardized values for CSF biomarkers with a good correlation with classical manual assays.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call