Abstract

The assessment of water availability using hydrological models is subject to modeling uncertainties. Model performance evaluation based on conventional likelihood measures on an overall time-series simulation has shortcomings. To overcome this, a model diagnostic evaluation is carried out. The main objectives of the study are to (a) demonstrate the strength of the model diagnostic assessment, (b) formulate an improved likelihood measure through a flow duration curve (FDC)–based flow portioning to enhance model performance, and (c) correlate the model simulation to basin hydroclimatic features. The objectives are achieved through the use of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model within a generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) framework applied on 17 basins in the Southeastern United States. The results indicate that the diagnostic assessment is crucial in model evaluation. The two-phase model assessment helped to improve model performance by 6% in terms of Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency for overall flow time series, 32% in terms of average volume efficiency, and 24% in terms of the ratio of the root-mean square error to the standard deviation of observation for the low flows.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call