Abstract

Background and Aim:Empirical antimicrobial therapy is frequently given in superficial bacterial folliculitis (SBF) and otitis externa (OE) in dogs, especially for the initial clinical presentation. Culture and subsequent antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) are generally limited to chronic cases with poor response to initial therapy. Several factors contribute to the failure to implement the use of AST in veterinary practice, i.e., long laboratory turnaround time or special requirements for sample shipping. Point-of-care (PoC) testing might reduce laboratory turnaround time and costs and the risk of emergence of multidrug-resistant pathogens. This study evaluated the Speed Biogram™ PoC test in canine SBF and OE compared with conventional methods for culture and AST.Materials and Methods:Thirty-four canine samples were analyzed: eleven from SBF, seven from bacterial OE, four from mixed OE, six from Malassezia spp. OE, and six negative controls. Sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of the PoC test and the agreement between the PoC test and conventional methods were evaluated.Results:Se and Sp of PoC test in discriminating between healthy and unhealthy subjects were 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 87.66-100.00) and 100% (95% CI 54.1-100.0), respectively. For bacterial identification, the k value was 0.532. Se and Sp of PoC tests for AST were 81.73% (95% CI 72.95-88.63) and 93.10% (95% CI 88.86-96.98), respectively with a total good agreement between tests (mean k=0.714), but major (8/27) and very major (19/27) errors were observed in 55% of bacterial conventional culture-positive samples.Conclusion:PoC test can identify dogs with SBF and OE, but AST is not sufficiently accurate. The lack of susceptibility testing for methicillin makes this test inappropriate for use in small animal practice.

Highlights

  • Superficial bacterial folliculitis (SBF) and otitis externa (OE) are very common in dogs and typically require long-term treatment

  • This study evaluated the Speed BiogramTM PoC test in canine superficial bacterial folliculitis (SBF) and OE compared with conventional methods for culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST)

  • Se and Sp of PoC tests for AST were 81.73% and 93.10%, respectively with a total good agreement between tests, but major (8/27) and very major (19/27) errors were observed in 55% of bacterial conventional culture-positive samples

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Superficial bacterial folliculitis (SBF) and otitis externa (OE) are very common in dogs and typically require long-term treatment. The most frequent bacterial pathogen isolated from clinical canine samples [2] and the predominant agent of canine SBF [1] is Staphylococcus pseudintermedius (formerly S. intermedius). This is a commensal Grampositive coagulase-positive bacterium that resides on the mucosal and skin surfaces of healthy dogs [2,3] and can be an opportunistic pathogen causing a skin infection. Empirical antimicrobial therapy is frequently given in superficial bacterial folliculitis (SBF) and otitis externa (OE) in dogs, especially for the initial clinical presentation.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.