Abstract

The diagnosis of single-lesion paucibacillary leprosy remains a challenge. Reviews by expert dermatopathologists and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) results obtained from 66 single-plaque biopsy samples were compared. Histological findings were graded as high (HP), medium (MP) or low (LP) probability of leprosy or other dermatopathy (OD). Mycobacterium leprae-specific genes were detected using qPCR. The biopsies of 47 out of 57 clinically diagnosed patients who received multidrug therapy were classified as HP/MP, eight of which were qPCR negative. In the LP/OD (n = 19), two out of eight untreated patients showed positive qPCR results. In the absence of typical histopathological features, qPCR may be utilised to aid in final patient diagnosis, thus reducing overtreatment and delay in diagnosis.

Highlights

  • The diagnosis of leprosy is confirmed by evidence of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in slit-skin smears or tissue samples or by the presence of characteristic histological alterations of the nerves or skin

  • Skin biopsy samples from 86 patients with a single plaque, but no previous history of leprosy, who attended the clinic for diagnostic purposes from January 2008-December 2011 were selected

  • The presence of Mycobacterium leprae-specific genes was detected using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and the results were compared to the histopathology grading and clinical data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The diagnosis of leprosy is confirmed by evidence of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in slit-skin smears or tissue samples or by the presence of characteristic histological alterations of the nerves or skin. Because an accurate diagnosis in these cases is challenging, the results of reviews by expert dermatopathologists and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analyses of single-plaque biopsy samples were compared to evaluate previous therapeutic decisions. Skin biopsy samples from 86 patients with a single plaque, but no previous history of leprosy, who attended the clinic for diagnostic purposes from January 2008-December 2011 were selected.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.