Abstract

Background and purposeDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is a cornerstone in diagnostic of ischemic stroke. The aim of this study was to investigate the usefulness of high-b-value computed DWI (c-DWI) in comparison to standard DWI in patients with acute brainstem infarction. Materials and methods56 patients with acute brainstem infarction were retrospectively analysed by two readers. DWI was obtained with the b-values 0, 500 and 1000 s/mm² on either a 1.5 or 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. c-DWI was calculated with a monoexponential model with high b-values 2000, 3000, 4000 and 5000 s/mm². All c-DWI series with high-b-values were compared to the standard DWI sequence at b-value of 1000 s/mm² in terms of image artifacts, lesion extent and contrast. ResultsThere was no statistically significant difference between 1.5 and 3 T MRI regarding the measured ischemic lesion size. There were no statistically significant differences between the ischemic lesion sizes on DWI at b-values of 1000 s/mm² and on c-DWI at higher b-values. Overall, the contrast between the lesion and the surrounding normal areas improved with increasing b-value on the isotropic DWIs: maximum at b = 5000, followed by that at b 2000 and b 1000 s/mm², in order. The best relation between artifacts and lesion contrast was identified for b 2000 s/mm². ConclusionHigh b-value DWI derived from c-DWI has a higher visibility for ischemic brainstem lesions compared to standard DWI without additional time cost. The b-2000 image is recommended to use in clinical routine, higher b-value images lead to more imaging artifacts, which might result in misdiagnosis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.