Abstract

It is now more than a century since Albert Calmette from the Institut Pasteur changed the world of envenomation by demonstrating that antibodies raised against animal venoms have the ability to treat human victims of previously fatal bites or stings. Moreover, the research initiated at that time effectively launched the discipline of toxicology, first leading to the search for toxic venom components, followed by the demonstration of venoms that also contained compounds of therapeutic value. Interest from pharmaceutical companies to treat envenomation is, however, declining, mainly for economic reasons, and hence, the World Health Organization has reclassified this public health issue to be a highest priority concern. While the production, storage, and safety of antivenom sera suffer from major inconveniences, alternative chemical and technological approaches to the problem of envenomation need to be considered that bypass the use of antibodies for toxin neutralization. Herein, we review an emerging strategy that relies on the use of aptamers and discuss how close—or otherwise—we are to finding a viable alternative to the use of antibodies for the therapy of human envenomation.

Highlights

  • The history of antivenom sera began with a French doctor, Albert Calmette, who, at the end of the 19th century, began immunization work using cobra venom with rabbits as animal models [1]

  • He described several immunization strategies; the most reputed, which is still in use today, was the administration of increasing venom concentrations in order to develop antitoxin antibodies. The novelty of this investigation was the fact that the serum of injected animals had both preventive and therapeutic properties, since injection of serum from an immunized rabbit to a control rabbit prevented the toxic signs of envenomation

  • Vital Brazil, who became the first director of the Butantan institute in São Paulo, developed the concept of polyvalent serum to enlarge its therapeutic value against the venoms from several species of snakes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The history of antivenom sera began with a French doctor, Albert Calmette, who, at the end of the 19th century, began immunization work using cobra venom with rabbits as animal models [1] In this work, he described several immunization strategies; the most reputed, which is still in use today, was the administration of increasing venom concentrations in order to develop antitoxin antibodies. He described several immunization strategies; the most reputed, which is still in use today, was the administration of increasing venom concentrations in order to develop antitoxin antibodies The novelty of this investigation was the fact that the serum of injected animals had both preventive and therapeutic properties, since injection of serum from an immunized rabbit to a control rabbit prevented the toxic signs of envenomation (for a complete description of the career endeavors of Albert Calmette, see [2]). For accurate reviews on the history of antivenoms, we refer readers to references [14,15,16]

Envenomation is still a Major Public Health Problem
Major Threats to Antivenom Production and Usage
Toxin Activity-Based Antivenoms
Bioinformatic-Assisted Rationale Snake Antivenom Design
Monoclonal Antibodies
Other Technological and Chemical Initiatives
Comparative Advantages in Using Aptamers over Antibodies
Aptamer Selection Procedures and Property Improvements
DNA Aptamers against Cardiotoxin from Naja Atra Snake Venom
First RNA Aptamers Targeted against Loxosceles Laeta Spider Toxins
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.