Abstract

Abstract. We perform a land-surface model intercomparison to investigate how the simulation of permafrost area on the Tibetan Plateau (TP) varies among six modern stand-alone land-surface models (CLM4.5, CoLM, ISBA, JULES, LPJ-GUESS, UVic). We also examine the variability in simulated permafrost area and distribution introduced by five different methods of diagnosing permafrost (from modeled monthly ground temperature, mean annual ground and air temperatures, air and surface frost indexes). There is good agreement (99 to 135  ×  104 km2) between the two diagnostic methods based on air temperature which are also consistent with the observation-based estimate of actual permafrost area (101  × 104 km2). However the uncertainty (1 to 128  ×  104 km2) using the three methods that require simulation of ground temperature is much greater. Moreover simulated permafrost distribution on the TP is generally only fair to poor for these three methods (diagnosis of permafrost from monthly, and mean annual ground temperature, and surface frost index), while permafrost distribution using air-temperature-based methods is generally good. Model evaluation at field sites highlights specific problems in process simulations likely related to soil texture specification, vegetation types and snow cover. Models are particularly poor at simulating permafrost distribution using the definition that soil temperature remains at or below 0 °C for 24 consecutive months, which requires reliable simulation of both mean annual ground temperatures and seasonal cycle, and hence is relatively demanding. Although models can produce better permafrost maps using mean annual ground temperature and surface frost index, analysis of simulated soil temperature profiles reveals substantial biases. The current generation of land-surface models need to reduce biases in simulated soil temperature profiles before reliable contemporary permafrost maps and predictions of changes in future permafrost distribution can be made for the Tibetan Plateau.

Highlights

  • The Tibetan Plateau (TP) has the highest and largest lowlatitude frozen ground in the world, with more than 50 % of its area occupied by permafrost (Zhou et al, 2000)

  • Air-temperature-derived permafrost maps are investigated with the two indirect methods, F and mean annual air temperature (MAAT)

  • That is because the empirical threshold of −2 ◦C for MAAT fits well with TP observations (Xu et al, 2001), while F ≥ 0.5 is a theoretical assumption, which has been reported to overestimate permafrost area (Nelson and Outcalt, 1987; Slater and Lawrence, 2013)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Tibetan Plateau (TP) has the highest and largest lowlatitude frozen ground in the world, with more than 50 % of its area occupied by permafrost (Zhou et al, 2000). As the TP gets intensely warmer (IPCC, 2013; Wu et al, 2013), the impact of degraded permafrost on desertification (Li et al, 2005, 2014; Yang et al, 2010), water cycling (Cheng and Jin, 2013; Yao et al, 2013), carbon budget (Dörfer et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2008; Schuur et al, 2008), and infrastructure (Wu and Niu, 2013; Yu et al, 2013) have become active research topics

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call