Abstract

BackgroundThe usage of urine protein/creatinine ratio to estimate daily urine protein excretion is prevalent, but relatively little attention has been paid to the influence of urine concentration and its impact on test accuracy. We took advantage of 24-hour urine collection to examine both urine protein/creatinine ratio (UPCR) and daily urine protein excretion, with the latter as the reference standard. Specific gravity from a concomitant urinalysis of the same urine sample was used to indicate the urine concentration.MethodsDuring 2010 to 2014, there were 540 adequately collected 24h urine samples with protein concentration, creatinine concentration, total volume, and a concomitant urinalysis of the same sample. Variables associated with an accurate UPCR estimation were determined by multivariate linear regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to determine the discriminant cut-off values of urine creatinine concentration for predicting an accurate UPCR estimation in either dilute or concentrated urine samples.ResultsOur findings indicated that for dilute urine, as indicated by a low urine specific gravity, UPCR is more likely to overestimate the actual daily urine protein excretion. On the contrary, UPCR of concentrated urine is more likely to result in an underestimation. By ROC curve analysis, the best cut-off value of urine creatinine concentration for predicting overestimation by UPCR of dilute urine (specific gravity ≦ 1.005) was ≦ 38.8 mg/dL, whereas the best cut-off values of urine creatinine for predicting underestimation by UPCR of thick urine were ≧ 63.6 mg/dL (specific gravity ≧ 1.015), ≧ 62.1 mg/dL (specific gravity ≧ 1.020), ≧ 61.5 mg/dL (specific gravity ≧ 1.025), respectively. We also compared distribution patterns of urine creatinine concentration of 24h urine cohort with a concurrent spot urine cohort and found that the underestimation might be more profound in single voided samples.ConclusionsThe UPCR in samples with low or high specific gravity is more likely to overestimate or underestimate actual daily urine protein amount, respectively, especially in a dilute urine sample with its creatinine below 38.8 mg/dL or a concentrated sample with its creatinine above 61.5 mg/dL. In particular, UPCR results should be interpreted with caution in cases that involve dilute urine samples because its overestimation may lead to an erroneous diagnosis of proteinuric renal disease or an incorrect staging of chronic kidney disease.

Highlights

  • The diagnosis and management of proteinuric renal diseases and the staging of chronic kidney disease (CKD) require accurate identification and quantitation of proteinuria [1]

  • The usage of urine protein/creatinine ratio to estimate daily urine protein excretion is prevalent, but relatively little attention has been paid to the influence of urine concentration and its impact on test accuracy

  • Our findings indicated that for dilute urine, as indicated by a low urine specific gravity, urine protein/ creatinine ratio (UPCR) is more likely to overestimate the actual daily urine protein excretion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The diagnosis and management of proteinuric renal diseases and the staging of chronic kidney disease (CKD) require accurate identification and quantitation of proteinuria [1]. In current clinical practice, spot urine protein/ creatinine ratio (UPCR) is widely used to estimate daily protein excretion by virtue of its convenience and simplicity [2]. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) of the National Kidney Foundation Practice Guideline recommended the use of “spot” urine protein/ creatinine measurements to detect proteinuria when staging CKD; it recommended that under most circumstances, untimed (“spot”) urine sample should be used to detect and monitor proteinuria in children and adults and it is usually not necessary to obtain a timed urine collection (overnight or 24-hour) for these evaluations in either children or adults [1;3;4]. The usage of urine protein/creatinine ratio to estimate daily urine protein excretion is prevalent, but relatively little attention has been paid to the influence of urine concentration and its impact on test accuracy. Specific gravity from a concomitant urinalysis of the same urine sample was used to indicate the urine concentration

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call