Abstract

The (13)C-urea breath test ((13)C-UBT) is a reliable non-invasive method of diagnosing Helicobacter pylori infection in adults and children. However, only a few validation studies have been performed on the (13)C-UBT in very young children. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the (13)C-UBT according to age, and to determine the optimal cut-off value in children. A total of 307 (13)C-UBT were performed in 274 children. All were compared with the results of endoscopic biopsy-based methods to confirm H. pylori infection. Seventy-five milligrams of (13)C-urea was ingested without a test meal. Two breath samples were collected at 0 and 30 min. The optimal cut-off value of the (13)C-UBT was assessed by determining the sensitivity, specificity, false negative, and false positive results, at cut-off values ranging from 2.0 to 10.0 per thousand. The delta over baseline (DOB) values of the (13)C-UBT showed a significant negative correlation with age in both the H. pylori-positive group (r = -0.309; P = 0.005) and the H. pylori-negative group (r = -0.162; P = 0.015). High false positive results and low specificity were noted in children aged 6 years or less compared with children older than 6 years at a cut-off value of 4.0 per thousand (false positives; 8.3%vs 0.85%, specificity; 89.8%vs 98.8%). After adjusting the cut-off value, the optimal cut-off values were found to be 4.0 per thousand in children older than 6 years and 7.0 per thousand in children aged 6 years or less. The cut-off value of the (13)C-UBT recommended regardless of age must be adjusted in preschool children to reduce the false positive results.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.