Abstract

To assess case-finding performance of the Frequency Doubling Technology Perimeter (FDT) (CarlZeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA), Moorfields Motion Displacement Test (MMDT) (Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK), iVue optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Optovue Inc., Fremont, CA), and ocular response analyzer (ORA) (Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Depew, NY), alone or combined, for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Cross-sectional, observational, community-based study. A total of 505 subjects aged ≥60 years recruited from a community setting using no predefined exclusion criteria. Subjects underwent 4 index tests conducted by a technician unaware of subjects' ocular status. FDT and MMDT were used in suprathreshold mode. iVue OCT measured ganglion cell complex and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. Reference standard was full ophthalmic examination by an experienced clinician who was masked to index test results. Subjects were classified as POAG (open drainage angle, glaucomatous optic neuropathy, and glaucomatous field defect), glaucoma suspect, ocular hypertension, or non-POAG/nonocular hypertension. Test performance evaluated the individual as the unit of analysis. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using predefined cutoffs for abnormality, generating sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios. Continuous data were used to derive estimates of sensitivity at 90% specificity and partial area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) plots from 90% to 100% specificity. From the reference standard examination, 26 subjects (5.1%) had POAG and 32 subjects (6.4%) were glaucoma suspects. Sensitivity (95% confidence interval) at 90% specificity for detection of glaucoma suspect/POAG combined was 41% (28-55) for FDT, 35% (21-48) for MMDT, and 57% (44-70) for best-performing OCT parameter (inferior quadrant RNFL thickness); for POAG, sensitivity was 62% (39-84) for FDT, 58% (37-78) for MMDT, and 83% (68-98) for inferior quadrant RNFL thickness. Partial AUROC was significantly greater for inferior RNFL thickness than visual-function tests (P < 0.001). Post-test probability of glaucoma suspect/POAG combined and definite POAG increased substantially when best-performing criteria were combined for FDT or MMDT, iVue OCT, and ORA. Diagnostic performance of individual tests gave acceptable accuracy for POAG detection. Low specificity of visual-function tests precludes their use in isolation, but case detection improves by combining RNFL thickness analysis with visual function tests.

Highlights

  • Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience

  • Post-test probability of glaucoma suspect /primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) combined and definite POAG increased substantially when best-performing criteria were combined for FDT or Moorfields Motion Displacement Test (MMDT), iVue Optical Coherence Tomographer (OCT) and Ocular response analyzer (ORA)

  • Epidemiological studies in developed countries consistently demonstrated that approximately half of those with Open angle glaucoma (OAG) remained undetected using current casefinding strategies. 2-8

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK. The iVue Optical Coherence Tomographer used in this study was loaned by Optovue Inc., which provided a part-proportion of funding for the technician to undertake the index tests during data collection. Optovue Inc. made suggestions at the protocol stage of the study but had no input in the data analysis and interpretation. The College of Optometrists, UK provided a

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call