Abstract

Uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis enables dynamic preload assessment in a minimally invasive fashion. Evidence about the validity of the technique in patients with impaired left ventricular function is scarce, while adequate cardiac preload assessment would be of great value in these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of stroke volume variation (SVV) measured with the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system in patients with impaired left ventricular function. In this prospective, observational study, 22 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40 % or less undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were included. Patients were considered fluid responsive if cardiac output increased with 15 % or more after volume loading (7 ml kg−1 ideal body weight). The following variables were calculated: area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve, ideal cut-off value for SVV, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and overall accuracy. In addition, SVV cut-off points to obtain 90 % true positive and 90 % true negative predictions were determined. ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.70 [0.47; 0.92]. The ideal SVV cut-off value was 10 %, with a corresponding sensitivity and specificity of 56 and 69 % respectively. Overall accuracy was 64 %, positive and negative predictive values were 69 and 56 % respectively. SVV values to obtain more than 90 % true positive and negative predictions were 16 and 6 % respectively. The ability of uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis SVV to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with impaired LVF was low.

Highlights

  • Volume loading remains one of the cornerstones in the treatment of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit and operating room

  • We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of stroke volume variation (SVV) measured with the FloTrac/VigileoTM system to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of

  • The predictive value of SVV found in this study was lower in comparison with the results from a systematic review and meta-analysis and in individual trials [6, 8]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Volume loading remains one of the cornerstones in the treatment of critically ill patients in the intensive care unit and operating room. In patients with impaired left ventricular function (LVF), cardiac decompensation may occur. Withholding fluids may further decrease cardiac output (CO), leading to a low CO state and impaired tissue perfusion. This emphasizes the need for adequate assessment of cardiac preload in these patients. Dynamic preload assessment with uncalibrated arterial waveform analysis provides a less invasive alternative [5, 6]. The dynamic preload indices stroke volume variation (SVV) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) are the result of the cyclic influence of positive pressure ventilation on stroke volume and pulse pressure in mechanically

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.