Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess the diagnostic accuracy of physical examination findings used to identify patients at risk for midfacial or mandibular fractures. Materials and MethodsA five-year retrospective cohort was constructed from all emergency department patients with a midfacial or mandibular trauma. The sensitivity, specificity, pre-test probability, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio data was calculated for 19 and 14 physical examination findings for midfacial and mandibular fractures respectively. Computed Tomography and panoramic radiography were used as index tests. ResultsA total of 1484 patients were identified among whom 40.4% midfacial and 33.4% mandibular fractures were diagnosed. Overall, specificity was found to be higher than sensitivity. Regarding midfacial fractures, high specificity was found for raccoon eyes, malar eminence flattening and all the findings that are related to palpation, the nasal, ocular and intra-oral assessment. Malar eminence flattening, external nasal deformity, nasal septum hematoma, change of globe position and palpable step-off had ad high positive predictive value and positive likelihood ratio. Regarding mandibular fractures high specificity was found for mouth opening restriction, auditory canal bleeding, intra-oral assessment related findings, palpable step-off, inferior alveolar nerve paresthesia, the angular compression test and chin axial pressure test. ConclusionsThe diagnostic accuracy of relevant physical examination findings were identified for the prediction of midfacial and mandibular fractures.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe primary and secondary assessments are used to evaluate all injuries and to identify critically injured patients

  • Maxillofacial injuries comprise a substantial part of head and neck trauma’s in today’s emergency department

  • Chart review was conducted to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of physical examination findings for midfacial and mandibular fractures

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The primary and secondary assessments are used to evaluate all injuries and to identify critically injured patients. Patients are assessed clinically to determine which patients are at risk for midfacial and mandibular fractures and require radiological imaging. The physical examination of the midface and mandible is characterized by the complex anatomy and broad range of potential fracture type outcomes. Previous studies assessed how a selection of these physical examination findings can be used to predict midfacial and mandibular fractures [1,2,3]. Those studies only investigated a selection of physical examination findings, and data from other findings regarding predictability is lacking

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call