Abstract

BackgroundAs the number of persons with diabetes is projected to double in the next 25 years in the US, an accurate method of identifying diabetic foot ulcers in population-based data sources are ever more important for disease surveillance and public health purposes. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the accuracy of existing methods and to propose a new method.MethodsFour existing methods were used to identify all patients diagnosed with a foot ulcer in a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) hospital from the inpatient and outpatient datasets for 2003. Their electronic medical records were reviewed to verify whether the medical records positively indicate presence of a diabetic foot ulcer in diagnoses, medical assessments, or consults. For each method, five measures of accuracy and agreement were evaluated using data from medical records as the gold standard.ResultsOur medical record reviews show that all methods had sensitivity > 92% but their specificity varied substantially between 74% and 91%. A method used in Harrington et al. (2004) was the most accurate with 94% sensitivity and 91% specificity and produced an annual prevalence of 3.3% among VA users with diabetes nationwide. A new and simpler method consisting of two codes (707.1× and 707.9) shows an equally good accuracy with 93% sensitivity and 91% specificity and 3.1% prevalence.ConclusionsOur results indicate that the Harrington and New methods are highly comparable and accurate. We recommend the Harrington method for its accuracy and the New method for its simplicity and comparable accuracy.

Highlights

  • As the number of persons with diabetes is projected to double in the 25 years in the US, an accurate method of identifying diabetic foot ulcers in population-based data sources are ever more important for disease surveillance and public health purposes

  • Prevalence rates of diabetic foot ulcers based on four methods We identified 866,881 patients who used Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare services in the US in 2003 with a diagnosis of diabetes

  • Annual prevalence rates of diabetic foot ulcers ranged between 2.7% and 3.9% from method to method (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As the number of persons with diabetes is projected to double in the 25 years in the US, an accurate method of identifying diabetic foot ulcers in population-based data sources are ever more important for disease surveillance and public health purposes. Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are significant public health concerns due to high economic burden [1,2,3,4], negative impact on quality of life [5,6], and their association with increased risk of amputation [7,8] and premature death [9,10]. Their national estimates of incidence or prevalence rates are not currently available, possibly due to. Any patient with one or more claims containing a foot ulcer-related diagnosis or procedure in any fields was identified as having the DFU diagnosis

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.