Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) to detect non-traumatic bone marrow edema: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

PurposeThis meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for detecting bone marrow edema (BME) in non-traumatic patients. MethodsA systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed up to October 1, 2021 for relevant original studies. Study details were extracted by two independent reviewers. A bivariate mixed-effects regression model was used to assess comprehensive diagnostic performance, and a subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate sources of variability. The risk of bias was evaluated with the QUADAS-2 tool. ResultsTen studies involving 2463 regions, including hands, ankles, hips, and sacroiliac joints, were evaluated in this meta-analysis. Summary sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values for BME were 88.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 82.4%–92.5%), 96.1% (95% CI 94.4%–97.3%), and 0.98 (95% CI 96%–99%), respectively. The subgroup analysis showed that studies using a thicker slice (≥1 mm) had a higher sensitivity, and studies with older patients (≥60 years), fewer included patients (<40), and bones other than the pelvis had a higher specificity. Studies presented a generally low or unclear risk for bias and applicability concerns. ConclusionsDECT has an excellent diagnostic performance for detecting BME in non-traumatic patients and may provide an alternative to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of non-traumatic BME in the future, especially when MRI is unavailable or contraindicated.