Abstract

PurposeDiabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) is a common and disabling complication of diabetes, with cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) being a major cause of mortality and morbidity. Standard autonomic function tests (AFT) are cumbersome and time consuming to conduct in OPD setting.ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of composite autonomic symptom scale 31 (COMPASS-31) as a screening test for DAN.Patients and methodsA cross-sectional study which enrolled 60 type 2 diabetes individuals was conducted at a tertiary care center. Autonomic functions were evaluated by COMPASS-31 questionnaire as well as by standard Ewing's battery of tests; short-term heart rate variability; sympathetic skin response along with nerve conduction studies.ResultsThirty males and 24 females completed the study. Forty-nine (89%) participants had CAN, of which, 9 (17%) had definite CAN. Peripheral neuropathy was present in 20 (37%). COMPASS-31 scores showed no difference between “No CAN” and “Early CAN”. “Definite CAN” individuals differed significantly from “No and Early CAN” on COMPASS-31 scores and its gastrointestinal sub-domain. Receiver operating characteristic between “Definite CAN” and “No and Early CAN” showed fair accuracy with AUC of 0.731 (95% CI 0.561–0.901), sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 71.7% at a cut-off of 28.67 of COMPASS-31 score. Gastrointestinal sub-domain, at a cut-off score of 5.8, had 77.8% sensitivity, 60% specificity, and AUC was 0.748 (95% CI 0.603–0.894).ConclusionCOMPASS-31, a self-administered tool, requiring less time, qualifies as an acceptable screening tool, especially for definite CAN. However, individuals scoring low on COMPASS-31 are still required to be evaluated by Ewing’s battery to differentiate between “Early CAN” and “No CAN”.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call