Diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs and investigations for functional weakness, sensory and movement disorders: A systematic review

Abstract

IntroductionPatients with functional neurological disorders (FND) present with weakness, sensory or movement disorder without corresponding brain pathology. The current classificatory systems suggest an inclusionary approach to diagnose FND. Hence, there is a need to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs and electrophysiological investigations in view of the lack of gold standard tests to diagnose FND. MethodsPubMed and SCOPUS databases were searched for studies published from Jan 1950 to Jan 2022 which reported the diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs and electrophysiological investigations in patients with FND. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. ResultsTwenty-one studies (727 cases and 932 controls), of which 16 reported clinical signs and, five reported electrophysiological investigations, were included in the review. Two studies were of good quality, 17 of moderate quality, and two of poor quality. We identified 46 clinical signs (24 in weakness, 3 in sensory, and 19 in movement disorders) and 17 investigations (all in movement disorders). Specificity values for signs and investigations were comparatively high compared to the wide variance in sensitivity values. ConclusionElectrophysiological investigations appear to have a promising role in diagnosing FND, particularly functional movement disorders. The combined use of individual clinical signs and electrophysiological investigations may support and improve diagnostic certainty of FND. Future research can focus on improving the methodology and validating the existing clinical signs and electrophysiological investigations to enhance the validity of the composite diagnostic criterias for FND diagnosis.