Abstract

Background and aims. Early diagnosis of external root resorption is important for accurate treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a charge-coupled device (CCD) sensor and a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plate receptor in the diagnosis of artificial external root resorption.Materials and methods. In this diagnostic in-vitro study, 40 maxillary incisors were mounted in a segment of dry bone and preliminary radiographs were obtained using CCD and PSP sensors. Artificial resorption cavities were produced on the middle-third in half of the samples and on the cervical-third in the other half on the buccal root surfaces. Radiographs were repeated and images were evaluated. Data were statistically analyzed using chi-square and diagnostic tests.Results. There were no significant differences between the two sensors in the sensitivity (p=0.08 and 0.06) and specificity (p=0.13) for the diagnosis of resorption in both root areas. The overall accuracy of CCD was higher than PSP sensor; however, the difference was not statistically significance (p>0.05).Conclusion. CCD and PSP sensors chosen for the present study produced similar results in diagnosing simulated external root resorption.

Highlights

  • External root resorption results in dissolution of cementum, dentin and sometimes extends toward the pulp

  • The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a charge-coupled device (CCD) sensor and a photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plate receptor in the diagnosis of artificial external root resorption

  • CCD and PSP sensors chosen for the present study produced similar results in diagnosing simulated external root resorption

Read more

Summary

Introduction

External root resorption results in dissolution of cementum, dentin and sometimes extends toward the pulp. One of the most common regions for external root resorption is the cervical area of the root, it happens less probably in middle area too, and the highest incidence rate has been reported in anterior teeth.[1] Root resorption was first described by Bell in 1830.2 In most cases, no clinical symptoms are present and it is usually detected during routine radiography. When such lesions are found, they are at an advanced level and treatment is almost impossible.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.