Abstract

AimDespite increasing use for the detection of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (rPC), the diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with [18F]PSMA-1007 remains only partially investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for PC-local recurrence and metastases on a per region basis.Materials and methodsOne hundred seventy-seven consecutive patients undergoing [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT for rPC were retrospectively analysed. Six body regions were defined: prostate fossa, pelvic lymph nodes (LN), retroperitoneal LN, supradiaphragmatic LN, bones, and soft tissue. A region was counted positive if at least one PSMA-positive lesion suspicious for PC was observed. Confirmation of a true-positive PSMA-avid lesion was defined as positive by histopathology, fall in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (> 50%) after targeted therapy or confirmatory further CT, MRI, PET/CT, or bone scan imaging. Regions where additional imaging was able to confirm the absence of suspicious PC lesions or regions outside exclusively targeted RT with serum PSA decline (> 50%) were counted as true-negative regions. SE, SP, PPV, and NPV were calculated for all six regions.ResultsThe overall PET-positivity rate was 91%. Conclusive follow-up for affirmation or refutation of a PSMA-positive lesion was available for 81/152 patients on a per region basis. In this subgroup, overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 95% (CI: 0.90–0.98), 89% (CI: 0.83–0.93), 86% (0.80–0.90), and 96% (CI: 0.92–0.98), respectively. On a per region basis, PPV was 97% (CI: 0.83–0.99) for local recurrence, 93% (CI: 0.78–0.98) for pelvic LN, 87% (CI: 0.62–0.96) for retroperitoneal LN, 82% (CI: 0.52–0.95) for supradiaphragmatic LN, and 79% (0.65–0.89) for bone lesions. The number of solid organ metastases (n = 6) was too small for an accurate statistical analysis.ConclusionThe known high PET-positivity rate of [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT in rPC was confirmed, with corresponding high (> 90%) sensitivity and NPV on a per region basis. However, overall PPV was limited (86%), particularly for bone lesions (79%), which are a potential diagnostic weaknesses when using this tracer.

Highlights

  • In all patients with recurrence of prostate cancer (PC) (rPC) (n = 177) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was positive in 161 patients (PET-positive rate = 91%)

  • The known high detection rate for ­[18F]PSMA-1007 PET/ CT in a cohort of men with rPC was confirmed with a high PET-positivity rate, with corresponding high sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) on a per region basis

  • Overall good diagnostic accuracy was observed with high positive predictive value (PPV) for local recurrences and pelvic lymph node metastasis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Radioligands to the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have become the gold standard for the staging of primary prostate cancer (PC) [1,2,3,4] and restaging of patients with biochemical recurrence of PC (rPC), outperforming conventional imaging modalities and previous generation radiopharmaceuticals [2].In addition to [­68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11, a large number of alternative radioligands have become available, including but not limited to ­[68Ga]Ga-PSMA-I&T; ­[68Ga]GaTHP-PSMA; and [­18F]-labelled PSMA-radiotracers such1 3 Vol.:(0123456789)European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging as ­[18F]-rhPSMA-7, ­[18F]-DCFPyL, [18F]-JK-PSMA-7, or ­[18F]PSMA-1007 [5,6,7,8]. Initial studies with ­[18F]PSMA-1007 suggest improved detection rates especially in local relapses and pelvic lymph node metastases in proximity to the urinary tract [13,14,15,16,17]. For these patients, ­[18F]PSMA-1007 might be of benefit [13], the use of forced diuresis protocols with renally excreted ligands such as [­68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 can be an alternative [18,19,20], and where later acquisition time might improve lesion visibility and interpretability [21, 22]. Some limitations for this tracer have been reported, unspecific uptake in bone lesions [23,24,25]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call