Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the use of computed tomography (CT) with automatic rib unfolding and three-dimensional (3D) volume-rendered imaging in the detection and characterization of rib fractures and flail chest. A total of 130 patients with blunt chest trauma underwent whole-body CT, and five independent readers assessed the presence and characterization of rib fractures using traditional CT images, automatic rib unfolding, and 3D volume-rendered images in separate readout sessions at least 2weeks apart. A gold standard was established by consensus among the readers based on the combined analysis of conventional and reformatted images. Automatic rib unfolding significantly reduced mean reading time by 47.5%-74.9% (P<0.0001) while maintaining a comparable diagnostic performance for rib fractures (positive predictive value [PPV] of 82.1%-93.5%, negative predictive value [NPV] of 96.8%-98.2%, and 69.4%-94.2% and 96.9%-99.1% for conventional axial images and 70.4%-85.1% and 95.2%-96.6% for 3D images) and better interobserver agreement (kappa of 0.74-0.87). For flail chest, automatic rib unfolding showed a PPV of 85.7%-100%, NPV of 90.4%-99.0%, and 80.0%-100% and 89.7%-100% for conventional axial images and 76.9%-100% and 89.0%-92.1% for 3D images. Automatic rib unfolding demonstrated equivalent diagnostic performance to conventional images in detecting acute rib fractures and flail chest, with good interobserver agreement and time-saving benefits.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call