Abstract
Much research has been published over the last few years looking at alternative diagnostic systems for the diagnosis of occlusal caries in permanent teeth, but there has been little research on primary teeth. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of one alternative system (the Electronic Caries Monitor [ECM]) against visual diagnosis for the detection of occlusal dentine caries in primary teeth. Fifty-eight apparently noncavitated extracted first and second primary molars were selected. They were examined visually and with the ECM for dentine caries. Presence or absence of caries was validated by hemisecting the teeth and examining them under a stereomicroscope--37 teeth had occlusal dentine caries, 21 were sound or had enamel caries. Sensitivities and specificities of the ECM diagnoses were 0.81 and 0.90, respectively, and for the visual diagnosis were 0.73 and 1. In conclusion, the ECM did not provide increased accuracy over visual diagnosis when detecting occlusal caries in primary teeth.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.