Abstract
BackgroundNon-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is a common complication and accounts for a major cause of death in critically ill patients. The diagnosis of NOMI with respect to the eventual indications for surgical treatment is challenging. We addressed the performance of the diagnostic strategy of NOMI in the intensive care unit, with emphasis on contrast-enhanced abdominal CT-scan.MethodsThis was a retrospective monocenter study. Patients with clinically suspected acute mesenteric ischemia were included if a comprehensive diagnostic workup was carried out including surgical and/or endoscopic digestive explorations. Patients with evidence of occlusive mesenteric ischemia were excluded. A definite diagnosis of NOMI only relied on surgical or endoscopic findings. Abdominal CT-scans were reviewed by two radiologists blinded from the final diagnosis.ResultsA diagnosis of NOMI could be definitely confirmed or ruled out through surgical or endoscopic explorations of the digestive tract in 147 patients. With respect to their clinical characteristics, only a history of atrial fibrillation was an independent predictor of NOMI (odds ratio 8.3, 95% confidence interval 2.0–35.2, p = 0.004). Among them, 114 patients (75 with and 39 without NOMI) had previously been subjected to contrast-enhanced abdominal CT-scan. Portal venous gas, pneumatosis intestinalis and, to a lesser extent, abnormal contrast-induced bowel wall enhancement were poorly sensitive, but exhibited good specificities of 95, 85 and 71%, respectively. Nineteen out of 75 patients (25.3%) without any suggestive radiological signs finally exhibited mesenteric ischemia, including ten with intestinal necrosis.ConclusionsThe performance of abdominal CT-scan for the diagnosis of NOMI is limited. Radiological signs of advanced-stage ischemia are good predictors of definite mesenteric ischemia, while their absence should not be considered sufficient to rule out the diagnosis.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13613-016-0213-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is a common complication and accounts for a major cause of death in critically ill patients
Nine patients were excluded because the CT-scan displayed evidence of occlusive Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) with interrupted blood flow within the upper mesenteric artery
Surgery and digestive endoscopy led to a definite diagnosis of NOMI in 92 patients (70 and 22 patients, respectively) and ruled it out in 55 patients
Summary
Non-occlusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is a common complication and accounts for a major cause of death in critically ill patients. We addressed the performance of the diagnostic strategy of NOMI in the intensive care unit, with emphasis on contrast-enhanced abdominal CT-scan. Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a dreaded complication in critically ill patients and remains a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in most cases. The diagnosis of AMI is often challenging in critically ill patients, most especially for NOMI It can be suspected in the presence of clinical deterioration associated with digestive symptoms and biological manifestations suggestive of profound tissue ischemia or acute cell lysis. Contrast-enhanced abdominal CT-scan is the cornerstone of the diagnostic strategy and may provide direct or indirect arguments for impaired vascularization of the bowel [6]. A confirmatory diagnosis as well as the assessment of the extent of necrosis still commonly involves a direct visualization of the digestive tract by endoscopy and/or surgical exploration
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.