Abstract

To make the diagnosis of hypogonadism in an ageing man, in absence of rare organic cause often referred to as functional or late onset hypogonadism (LOH), he should present with a clinical syndrome suggestive of androgen deficiency and have consistently low serum testosterone (T) levels. This does not differ from the diagnosis of any other form of hypogonadism. Particular to LOH diagnostic are uncertainties surrounding this entity: signs and symptoms of androgen deficiency (including sexual symptoms) are nonspecific in older men; clinical significance of only moderately low T levels is uncertain; comorbidity plays a substantial role with potential for reversibility; the place of T therapy in these men is debatable. This context demands for a pragmatic, but appropriately conservative approach to diagnosis. Evaluation should be stepwise with clinical evaluation, if suggestive for androgen deficiency, followed by measurement of a fasting morning serum T, if unequivocally low to be confirmed in a separate morning sample by a second low T or, if initial T borderline low or in presence of factors known to affect SHBG, by a low calculated free T level. All other (free) T results make hypogonadism an unlikely cause of the patient's symptoms. In the absence of consensus cut-off levels for total and free T in the published clinical guidelines for diagnosis of hypogonadism, it seems appropriate in the context of LOH to use stringent criteria indicating a convincingly low serum T. The approach to the diagnosis of LOH is not fundamentally different from that of other forms of hypogonadism but should put extra weight on prioritizing the shunning of overdiagnosis above the risk of underdiagnosis.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call