Abstract
Within an appropriate clinical context, growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults must be demonstrated biochemically. The assays of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) per se do not establish the diagnosis of adult GHD. Similarly, the evaluation of spontaneous growth hormone (GH) secretion over 24 h has no diagnostic value in adulthood even when an ultra-sensitive GH assay is used. The diagnosis of adult GHD is established by provocative testing of GH secretion, and insulin-induced hypoglycaemia using the insulin tolerance test (ITT) is indicated as the test of choice. Alternative provocative tests of GH secretion have been proposed and have to be used with appropriate cut-off limits. Testing with GH releasing hormone (GHRH) alone has no diagnostic value, but when GHRH is given in combination with arginine or pyridostigmine it becomes the most potent and reproducible provocative test to evaluate the maximal secretory capacity of somatotrope cells. The potentiating effect of arginine on the GHRH-induced GH response is fully preserved while the stimulatory effect of GHRH + pyridostigmine is reduced in ageing. The GHRH + arginine test is well tolerated and reproducibly distinguishes between normal and GHD adult and elderly subjects. Thus, the GHRH + arginine test is the most promising alternative to the ITT provided that cut-off limits appropriate to its potent stimulatory effect are considered.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.