Abstract

The current study attempted to assess the potential proficiency of radioimmunodetection (RAID) of primary, residual, multicentric, and recurrent breast carcinoma using two radiolabeled murine monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs), anti-human milk fat globulin (HMFG1) labeled with iodine (123I) and anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) labeled with technetium (99Tc). Thirteen patients with suspicious clinical and/or mammographic primary or recurrent breast carcinoma were studied in a phase I-II prospective, consecutive, nonrandomized, noncontrolled study. Five patients received intravenous infusion with 0.5-2.0 mg anti-CEA MoAb type CYT 380 labeled with 99Tc [13-22 millicurie (mCI)] and 8 patients received intravenous infusion with 0.25-1.0 mg anti-HMFG1 MoAb (Unipath, U.K.) labeled with 123I (4-17 mCI). Both MoAbs used in this study demonstrated ability to bind specifically to breast cancer lesions, resulting in successful RAID in 10 of 12 of studied patients (5 of 5 patients in the anti-CEA-99Tc and 5 of 7 in the anti-HMFG-123I group--accuracy 83.3%). One patient was excluded due to protocol violation. Seven patients had true-positive scans when correlated with surgery (sensitivity 87.5%). The MoAb scans accurately diagnosed lesions in 3 of the 4 primary invasive breast carcinomas confirmed histologically. Presence of residual carcinoma following wide excision was established in 1 of 2 patients and presence of soft tissue metastases in 3 patients. Three patients had true-negative scan (specificity 75%): 2 patients presented with suspicious mammographic recurrence postlumpectomy and 1 patient had questionable soft tissue recurrence. One patient with primary breast carcinoma had a false-negative scan and another had a false-positive scan in the presence of fibrosis following lumpectomy and radiation therapy. No adverse reactions were noted in the patients studied. RAID findings were confirmed by immunohistochemistry in 6 of 9 cases studied. Our data suggest that radiolabeled MoAbs used in this study are potentially useful diagnostic agents for evaluation of primary or recurrent breast carcinoma, particularly in the areas where conventional methodology is limited.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call