Diagnosis of bone marrow involvement in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma should be based on both [18F]FDG-PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy findings

Abstract

Objective During the initial staging of certain lymphoma subtypes, 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) has become an alternative to bone marrow biopsy (BMB) for detecting bone marrow (BM) involvement. However, whether [18F]FDG-PET/CT can accurately detect BM involvement in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) remains unknown. Our study aimed to assess the diagnostic and prognostic capability of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for detecting BM involvement in AITL. Methods: This retrospective study included 84 individuals newly diagnosed with AITL who underwent baseline BMB and [18F]FDG-PET/CT. “BM involvement” was defined as one or both of the following: 1) angioimmunoblastic T-cells detected in the BM; or 2) initially heightened focal uptake having disappeared on follow-up [18F]FDG-PET/CT. The ability of [18F]FDG-PET/CT to detect BM cancerous lesions was respectively analyzed by BM involvement confirmed by BMB or the aforementioned definition as the reference standard. The patients’ clinical characteristics and survival and prognostic outcomes were respectively analyzed. Results Of the 84 participants, five (6.0%) displayed positive BMB and PET/BM results, 17 (20.2%) had BMB-positive but PET/BM-negative results, eight (9.5%) showed BMB-negative but PET/BM-positive outcomes, and 54 (64.3%) displayed negative BMB and PET/BM outcomes. Using pre-defined BM involvement as the reference standard, [18F]FDG-PET/CT exhibited a specificity of 100%, sensitivity of 40%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 75%, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%. In contrast, using BMB-detected BM involvement as reference, [18F]FDG-PET/CT exhibited a sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 38.5%, 76.1%, 22.7%, and 87.1%, respectively. Among patients with PET/BM-positive and BMB-negative outcomes, 62.5% (5/8) underwent upstaging from III to IV. In 58.8% (10/17) of patients who were initially diagnosed with stage II/III disease based on the [18F]FDG-PET/CT results, repeat BMB resulted in upstaging to IV. PET/BM-negative patients had a higher 3-year progression-free survival rate (38.3% vs. 22.8%, p = 0.018) and 3-year overall survival rate (64.4% vs. 34.6%, p = 0.011) than PET/BM-positive patients. Conclusion In AITL patients, PET/BM-positive results may obviate the necessity for repeat BMB to ascertain confirm BM involvement. PET/BM-negative results do not definitively exclude BM involvement. The combined use of [18F]FDG-PET/CT and BMB can increase the diagnostic accuracy of BM involvement for AITL patients.