Abstract

Introduction: Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia / cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) has major implications for the management of patients and their first-degree relatives. Diagnosis may be difficult and is based on a set of criteria proposed by the International Task Force (TF) for Cardiomyopathies in 1994. More recently, diagnostic criteria based on MRI or ECG only have been suggested in the literature. We evaluated the consistency in outcome between 3 different sets of diagnostic criteria.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.