Diagnosing peripheral lung lesions using endobronchial ultrasonography with guide sheath: A prospective registry study to assess the effect of virtual bronchoscopic navigation using a computed tomography workstation.

Abstract

Bronchoscopy has a lower diagnostic yield for peripheral lung lesions (PLL). Endobronchial ultrasound guide sheath transbronchial lung biopsy (EBUS GS TBLB) has been used to overcome such limitation. Recent studies revealed that combined methods (e.g., EBUS GS TBLB plus electromagnetic navigation [EMN] or virtual bronchoscopic navigation [VBN]) further improve the diagnostic yield. However, those systems are associated with a high cost burden. Accordingly, we attempted to use VBN by computed tomography (CT) workstation (Aquarius iNtuition, TeraRecon) not dedicated only for VBN as an adjunctive tool for EBUS GS TBLB. We performed a prospective registry study to investigate whether VBN by CT workstation could improve the diagnostic yield of PLL.Between February 2017 and February 2018, 128 patients with PLL were divided into 2 groups (VBN and non-VBN [NVBN]). In NVBN group (n = 64), EBUS GS TBLB was performed using a hand-drawn bronchial map based on CT images. VBN group (n = 64) underwent EBUS GS TBLB using VBN images.VBN using CT workstation did not improve the diagnostic yield of EBUS GS TBLB for PLL (VBN vs NVBN, 72% vs 80%, P = .284). VBN slightly reduced procedure time (minute [mean ± SD], 25.31 ± 10.33 vs 25.81 ± 9.22), navigation time (time to find the lesion) (9.10 ± 7.88 vs 9.50 ± 7.14), and fluoroscopy time (2.23 ± 2.39 vs 2.86 ± 4.61), while these differences were not statistically significant.The diagnostic yield of EBUS GS TBLB was not improved with VBN (compared with using a hand-drawn bronchial map). Although VBN slightly shortened the procedure-related times, which were not significantly different.