Abstract

We apply a series of null diagnostics based on the statefinder hierarchy to diagnose different holographic dark energy models including the original holographic dark energy, the new holographic dark energy, the new agegraphic dark energy, and the Ricci dark energy models. We plot the curves of statefinders $S^{(1)}_3$ and $S^{(1)}_4$ versus redshift $z$ and the evolutionary trajectories of $\{S^{(1)}_3, \epsilon\}$ and $\{S^{(1)}_4, \epsilon\}$ for these models, where $\epsilon$ is the fractional growth parameter. Combining the evolution curves with the current values of $S^{(1)}_3$, $S^{(1)}_4$, and $\epsilon$, we find that the statefinder $S^{(1)}_4$ performs better than $S^{(1)}_3$ for diagnosing the holographic dark energy models. In addition, the conjunction of the statefinder hierarchy and the fractional growth parameter is proven to be a useful method to diagnose the holographic dark energy models, especially for breaking the degeneracy of the new agegraphic dark energy model with different parameter values.

Highlights

  • In face of numerous Dark energy (DE) models, it is important to discriminate various models

  • The holographic DE models include the original holographic dark energy (HDE) [35], the new holographic dark energy (NHDE) [36], the new agegraphic dark energy (NADE) [37], and the Ricci dark energy (RDE) [38], which were all proposed based on the holographic principle

  • We introduce the general expressions of the statefinder hierarchy [53], and give the specific expressions of them which contain variables de and w dependent on redshift z, where de is the fractional density of DE and w is the equation of state (EOS) of DE (w ≡ pde/ρde)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In face of numerous DE models, it is important to discriminate various models. Sahni et al [20,21] introduced the statefinder diagnostic {r, s}, which is a geometrical diagnosis in a model-independent manner. Since different DE models exhibit different evolution trajectories in the r –s plane, and especially can be separated distinctively with the values of {r0, s0}, the statefinder can be used to diagnose different DE models [22–30]. Other diagnostics, such as Om and Om3 [31–33], were used to distinguish the DE models. We combine the statefinder hierarchy with the fractional growth parameter to differentiate the holographic DE models, following the method proposed in Ref. We use the statefinder hierarchy to diagnose holographic DE models including HDE, NHDE, NADE, and RDE.

The statefinder hierarchy and the growth rate of perturbations
The statefinder hierarchy
The growth rate of perturbations
Holographic dark energy models
The HDE model
The NADE model
The RDE model
Statefinder hierarchy diagnostic
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call