Abstract

Drug-induced acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a relatively common cause of hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (AKI). While prerenal AKI and acute tubular necrosis (ATN) are the most common forms of AKI in the hospital, AIN is likely the next most common. Clinicians must differentiate the various causes of hospital-induced AKI; however, it is often difficult to distinguish AIN from ATN in such patients. While standardized criteria are now used to classify AKI into stages of severity, they do not permit differentiation of the various types of AKI. This is not a minor point, as these different AKI types often require different therapeutic interventions. Clinicians assess and differentiate AIN from these other AKI causes by utilizing clinical assessment, various imaging tests, and certain laboratory data. Gallium scintigraphy has been employed with mixed results. While a few serum tests, such as eosinophilia may be helpful, examination of the urine with tests such as dipstick urinalysis, urine chemistries, urine eosinophils, and urine microscopy are primarily utilized. Unfortunately, these tools are not always sufficient to definitively clinch the diagnosis, making it a challenging task for the clinician. As a result, kidney biopsy is often required to accurately diagnose AIN and guide management.

Highlights

  • Clinicians commonly encounter acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients admitted to the general hospital wards and the intensive care units [1]

  • My personal experience is that many clinicians order urinary eosinophils in the workup of hospitalacquired AKI, making erroneous decisions based on potentially incorrect results

  • This study provides nephrologists with data to definitively recommend against eosinophiluria as a diagnostic test for acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) [25, 33]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Clinicians commonly encounter acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients admitted to the general hospital wards and the intensive care units [1]. Evaluation of AKI patients has become more standardized through the use of definitions such as the Risk-Injury-Failure-Loss-End Stage (RIFLE), Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), and Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) AKI criteria to diagnose and classify this entity [1, 7, 10]. These criteria, do not permit differentiation of the various types of AKI, including prerenal AKI, ATN, and AIN, which require different management approaches. A few serum tests may be helpful, but for the most part, urinary tests are utilized to differentiate AIN from these common causes of hospital-

Clinical history and physical exam
Serum eosinophils
Other tests
Ultrasound and CT scan
Gallium scintigraphy
Other diagnoses
Urine chemistries
Urine eosinophils
Urine microscopy
Kidney biopsy
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.