Abstract

The whole-brain functional connectivity (FC) pattern obtained from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data are commonly applied to study neuropsychiatric conditions such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) by using different machine learning models. Recent studies indicate that both hyper- and hypo- aberrant ASD-associated FCs were widely distributed throughout the entire brain rather than only in some specific brain regions. Deep neural networks (DNN) with multiple hidden layers have shown the ability to systematically extract lower-to-higher level information from high dimensional data across a series of neural hidden layers, significantly improving classification accuracy for such data. In this study, a DNN with a novel feature selection method (DNN-FS) is developed for the high dimensional whole-brain resting-state FC pattern classification of ASD patients vs. typical development (TD) controls. The feature selection method is able to help the DNN generate low dimensional high-quality representations of the whole-brain FC patterns by selecting features with high discriminating power from multiple trained sparse auto-encoders. For the comparison, a DNN without the feature selection method (DNN-woFS) is developed, and both of them are tested with different architectures (i.e., with different numbers of hidden layers/nodes). Results show that the best classification accuracy of 86.36% is generated by the DNN-FS approach with 3 hidden layers and 150 hidden nodes (3/150). Remarkably, DNN-FS outperforms DNN-woFS for all architectures studied. The most significant accuracy improvement was 9.09% with the 3/150 architecture. The method also outperforms other feature selection methods, e.g., two sample t-test and elastic net. In addition to improving the classification accuracy, a Fisher's score-based biomarker identification method based on the DNN is also developed, and used to identify 32 FCs related to ASD. These FCs come from or cross different pre-defined brain networks including the default-mode, cingulo-opercular, frontal-parietal, and cerebellum. Thirteen of them are statically significant between ASD and TD groups (two sample t-test p < 0.05) while 19 of them are not. The relationship between the statically significant FCs and the corresponding ASD behavior symptoms is discussed based on the literature and clinician's expert knowledge. Meanwhile, the potential reason of obtaining 19 FCs which are not statistically significant is also provided.

Highlights

  • Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a serious lifelong condition characterized by repetitive, restricted behavior as well as deficits in communication and reciprocal social interactions (American Psychiatric Association, 2013)

  • The hypothesis was that the stacked sparse auto-encoders (SAEs) in DNN-FS would generate reduced-dimension, highly discriminative representations with higher quality than those generated by DNN-woFS, and that, after training, this would be visible in the classification accuracy of the softmax regression (SR) classifiers using each system

  • A DNN model with a novel feature selection method was developed for classifying ASD patients and TD controls based on the whole-brain FC pattern (FCP)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a serious lifelong condition characterized by repetitive, restricted behavior as well as deficits in communication and reciprocal social interactions (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). The traditional procedure for diagnosing ASD is largely based on narrative interactions between individuals and clinical professionals (Yahata et al, 2016). Such methods, lacking biological evidence, are prone to generate a high variance during the diagnosis (Mandell et al, 2007) and require a long period to detect abnormalities (Nylander et al, 2013). FMRI measuring the changes of blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal in a non-invasive way has been applied to reveal regional associations or brain networks. Since resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) has become an important tool for investigating brain networks of different brain disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease (Chase, 2014), schizophrenia (Lynall et al, 2010), and ASD (Monk et al, 2009) and has generated many invaluable insights into neural substrates that underlie brain disorders

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call