Diagnoses, Demographics, and Utilization of Care as Encountered by Three U.S. Navy General Medical Officers

Abstract

U.S. Navy general medical officers (GMOs) are physicians serving as general practitioners. Although exceptions exist, most GMOs are not board-certified in a specialty. They are post-graduate year 1 (PGY-1)-trained, state-licensed physicians analogous to civilian general practitioners. We conducted a retrospective study using data generated from patient visits with active duty males and females from June 1 to 30, 1998, to describe diagnoses, demographics, and utilization of care patterns encountered by three PGY-1-trained GMOs at an ambulatory clinic. A total of 781 patient encounters with 123 diagnoses from a patient population of 3,178 were recorded. This is an average of 260 patient encounters per GMO, at a rate of 2.52 patients seen per patient-care hour. Fifty-seven consultations/referrals were requested (7.3% of encounters, 1.8% of the patient population). Personnel assigned to the clinic accounted for 4.2% of visits (2% of the patient population). Patient satisfaction was rated as "excellent" to "satisfactory," and no significant morbidity was observed at 1.5-year follow-up. With PGY-1 training, GMOs provide primary care to a substantial volume of prescreened patients and treat patients with a majority of diagnoses without referral or unacceptable complications. The role of GMOs, and perhaps other physicians without specialty training (i.e., general practitioners), in selected settings seems valid and may have advantageous medicoeconomic implications for military and civilian managed care systems.