Abstract

Tuffaceous material of the Lower Triassic Baikouquan Fm., NE Junggar Basin is closely associated with detrital particles and particularly with crenulated quartz grains and kaolinite. The amount tuff is reduced closed to the source area. The main component of the tuffaceous interstitial material is SiO2, followed by K2O, FeO, and MgO. The tuffaceous interstitial material can be further divided into three types: medium (basic) potassium-rich tuffaceous material, ultrabasic iron-magnesium tuffaceous material, and ultrabasic iron-magnesium rich tuffaceous material. Medium (basic) potassium-rich is dominated by fusiform shrinkage pores, often associated with kaolinite, while ultrabasic iron-magnesium rich tuff pores are not developed, and ultrabasic iron-magnesium tuffaceous material is dominated by dissolution pores. The solution pores have large diameters and large volume of pores and throats, but low pores and throats coordination number. The pore size and the pores and throats volume of shrinkage fractures are small, but the pores and throats coordination number are large. Dissolution pores are mainly distributed in Mbr 1, whereas shrinkage pores mainly occur in Mbr 2. However, the interlayer productivity data from a single well show that the Mbr 1 has a higher productivity than Mbr 2. However, the interlayer productivity data from a single well show that Mbr 1 has a higher productivity than Mbr 2. In addition, tuff is not responsible for wind action, but the cause of intermittent water flow transport in volcanic rocks. Distributary channels at the fan delta front comprise the dominant facies for development of tuffaceous interstitial materials. The composition of tuffaceous interstitial material clearly determines reservoir quality. Medium basic potassium-rich tuff has a high SiO2 content and is prone to devitrification, so it is dominated by shrinkage pores, whereas ultrabasic iron-magnesium tuff contains FeO and MgO and is vulnerable to acid corrosion and the formation of corrosion pores. However, acid minerals such as kaolinite reduce reservoir connectivity. Compared with solution pores, shrinkage pores have a small pore volume, but high pores and throats coordination number, indicating that they have a high seepage capacity. Shrinkage pores are an important factor in causing production differences between single layers and should be given more attentions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.