Abstract

The Middle Jurassic Tuwaiq Mountain Formation (TMF; formed of three members, from bottom to top T1, T2, and T3) represents one of the primary conventional and unconventional reservoirs to be assessed in Saudi Arabia. It is considered as a tight carbonate reservoir in the Jafurah Basin and conventional reservoir in the Arabian Basin. Here, we investigate the depositional, diagenetic, and stratigraphic impact on reservoir quality and porosity evolution of the TMF through an integrated petrographical, geochemical and petrophysical analyses on outcrop samples. The TMF has a complex diagenetic history including micritization, dissolution, recrystallization and neomorphism, meteoric cementation, evaporite precipitation, dolomitization, silicification, dolomite dissolution and calcitization. Dolomitization occurred via a hypersaline fluid mechanism, based on texture, association with evaporites, and Sr concentration. X-ray diffraction results support chert replacing evaporite as the mechanism of the two chert beds in the T3 member due to the presence of anhydrite relics in their samples. This replacement formed the necessary Ca 2+ rich fluid for dolomite dissolution and calcitization. Therefore, dolomite calcitization occurs locally and is stratigraphically controlled based on its position relative to chert beds in T3. T3 and the upper part of the T2 member contain calcitized dolomites, while the lower part of T2 and T1 contain only dissolved dolomite. As the fluid went deeper in the TMF, it became weaker. Therefore, the fluid was too weak to develop dolomite calcitization process and instead only affected T1 and the lower part of T2 by dolomite dissolution. Overall, dolomite dissolution and dolomite calcitization didn't have a high impact on porosity evolution as the TMF isn't a highly dolomitized formation. The distribution of porosity (ø), permeability (K), and reservoir-quality-index (RQI) of the TMF are stratigraphically controlled. The TMF represents the regressive system tract of a 3rd order depositional sequence, which is composed of seven 4th order cycles (i.e. deep lagoon cycles (DLC) and shallow lagoon cycles (SLC)). RQI, Ø, and K plots showed great fitting with the 4th order depositional-cycles as DLC has very poor reservoir properties (average ø = 7.7%, average K = 0.17 mD, average RQI = 0.03), while SLC has fair reservoir properties (average ø = 15.4%, average K = 2.64 mD, average RQI = 0.11). Reservoir quality contrast is controlled by two factors: (1) the reduced mud-content and increased grain-content in SLC compared with DLC resulted in increased primary interparticle porosity, and is governed by depositional energy; and (2) the higher primary interparticle porosity in SLCs compared with DLCs preferentially facilitated more infiltration of undersaturated meteoric fluids, resulting in enhanced grain dissolution. This is reflected on the higher proportion of moldic and vuggy porosity in SLCs compared with DLCs. The accurate assessment of the TMF micro-scale attributes and controls on reservoir quality in an outcrop analogue that occurs in close proximity to subsurface hydrocarbon producing intervals can provide important input for oilfield appraisal and enhanced oil recovery performance. • Cementation was the main destructive diagenetic feature of the reservoir quality. • Depositional texture controlled primary porosity and dissolution related secondary porosity. • Dolomite-Calcitization and meteoric-dissolution had a stratigraphically controlled distribution. • Dolomitization happened through hypersaline fluids like many Jurassic carbonates in the Arabian Plate. • Dedolomitization mechanism was related to the process of chert replacing evaporites.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call