Abstract

This Nile Delta case study provides quantitative information on a process that we must understand and consider in full before attempting provenance interpretation of ancient clastic wedges. Petrographic and heavy-mineral data on partly lithified sand, silt, and mud samples cored from the up to 8.5 km-thick post-Eocene succession of the offshore Nile Delta document systematic unidirectional trends. With increasing age and burial depth, quartz increases at the expense of feldspars and especially of mafic volcanic rock fragments. Heavy-mineral concentration decreases drastically, transparent heavy minerals represent progressively lower percentages of the heavy fraction, and zircon, tourmaline, rutile, apatite, monazite, and Cr-spinel relatively increase at the expense mainly of amphibole in Pliocene sediments and of epidote in Miocene sediments. Recent studies have shown that the entire succession of the Nile Delta was deposited by a long drainage system connected with the Ethiopian volcanic highlands similar to the modern Nile since the lower Oligocene. The original mineralogy should thus have resembled that of modern Delta sand much more closely than the present quartzose residue containing only chemically durable heavy minerals. Stratigraphic compositional trends, although controlled by a complex interplay of different factors, document a selective exponential decay of non-durable species through the cored succession that explains up to 95% of the observed mineralogical variability. Our calculations suggest that heavy minerals may not represent >20% of the original assemblage in sediments buried less than ~1.5 km, >5% in sediments buried between 1.5 and 2.5 km, and >1% for sediments buried >4.5 km. No remarkable difference is detected in the intensity of mineral dissolution in mud, silt, and sand samples, which argues against the widely held idea that unstable minerals are prone to be preserved better in finer-grained and therefore presumably less permeable layers. Intrastratal dissolution, acting through long periods of time at the progressively higher temperatures reached during burial, can modify very drastically the relative abundance of detrital components in sedimentary rocks. Failure to recognize such a fundamental diagenetic bias leads to grossly mistaken paleogeographic reconstructions, as documented paradigmatically by previous provenance studies of ancient Nile sediments.

Highlights

  • The first question we need to ask when interpreting the detrital suite of an ancient sediment sample is whether and to what extent the observed mineralogical spectrum reflects the original composition at the instant of deposition

  • Three main components can be identified for modern Nile and Nile Delta sediments: a) volcanic detritus derived from Ethiopian highlands, dominant in levees and fluvial bars of the Atbara River, and in levees of the Blue Nile and the main Nile; b) detritus derived from Neoproterozoic ("PanAfrican") crystalline basement exposed all along the Red Sea rift shoulder, representing a large fraction of Blue Nile and main Nile fluvial bars; and, c) detritus recycled from Phanerozoic cover strata, which characterizes ephemeral tributaries of the lower course draining either the Red Sea Hills or the Sahara metacraton and dune sands of the Western Desert

  • Labile clinopyroxene derived from Ethiopian flood basalts dominates transparent-heavy-mineral assemblages in modern Nile sediments but it is rarely found in layers as young as the Pleistocene and virtually lacking in older strata

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The first question we need to ask when interpreting the detrital suite of an ancient sediment sample is whether and to what extent the observed mineralogical spectrum reflects the original composition at the instant of deposition. A fruitful approach to solve the tangle is to analyze in detail the mineralogical trends recorded by a thick vertical succession deposited at the mouth of a large river system, for which provenance may be assumed, as a first approximation, as constant through time. If such a "steady state" assumption is at least broadly fulfilled, the effect of burial diagenesis can be isolated and assessed. In the final part of the article, we integrate our results with heavy-mineral data from extensively studied sedimentary basins worldwide including the Gulf of Mexico, North Sea, and Bay of Bengal - and propose a standard sequence of mineralogical facies that may be used to investigate and sort out the relative impacts of provenance and diagenesis in the analysis of ancient clastic wedges

The Nile since the Oligocene
The age of the Nile
The Nile in the Quaternary
The Nile Cone
Petrography of Nile Delta sand through time
Modern Nile and Delta
Pleistocene to Oligocene
Comparison with modern sands and stratigraphic trends
Comparison with modern sediments and stratigraphic trends
Provenance or diagenesis?
What does sediment composition tell us?
The meaning of compositional change
Detangling the tangle
Checking for hydraulic-sorting effects
Extracting provenance information
Looking for climate change
Diagenetic control on heavy-mineral suites
Relative mineral durabilities
Quantifying heavy-mineral loss
Diagenetic minerofacies as a working tool
Vertical trends in contrasting settings
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call